<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question #7: Heather</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gusparents.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/question-7-heather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gusparents.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/question-7-heather/</link>
	<description>a resource for adoptive parents by adoptees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: heathernguyen</title>
		<link>http://gusparents.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/question-7-heather/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>heathernguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gusparents.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s true. Many Aparents have a slew of issues they need to deal with as parents and as of parents to adoptees. 

I&#039;m not sure I really understand what you mean by &quot;It&#039;s a gamble for the adoptee more than it is for the person adopting.&quot; From my point of view, there is no gamble for the adoptee because by its definition, gamble would indicate a choice. There is no choice for the adoptee, which is where one of the major flaws of the whole concept comes into play in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s true. Many Aparents have a slew of issues they need to deal with as parents and as of parents to adoptees. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I really understand what you mean by &#8220;It&#8217;s a gamble for the adoptee more than it is for the person adopting.&#8221; From my point of view, there is no gamble for the adoptee because by its definition, gamble would indicate a choice. There is no choice for the adoptee, which is where one of the major flaws of the whole concept comes into play in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://gusparents.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/question-7-heather/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gusparents.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many adoptees have attachment and emotional issues, for example,  even when adopted as an infant. And not all older adoptees will be “delinquents” either. It’s a gamble we take no matter how you choose to become a parent - whether by giving birth, sperm donor, or domestic or international adoption&quot;

And many adopters have the same issues and more! It&#039;s a gamble for the adoptee more than it is for the person adopting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many adoptees have attachment and emotional issues, for example,  even when adopted as an infant. And not all older adoptees will be “delinquents” either. It’s a gamble we take no matter how you choose to become a parent &#8211; whether by giving birth, sperm donor, or domestic or international adoption&#8221;</p>
<p>And many adopters have the same issues and more! It&#8217;s a gamble for the adoptee more than it is for the person adopting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
